3. SIPOC structure of the PTF

SIPOC stands for Supplier Input Process Output Customer

chevron-rightSupplierhashtag

Supplier

Definition: Suppliers are the responsible parties who feed input data, documents, or knowledge into the PTF. They provide verified information that serves as the basis for process, technology, and function.

Quality criteria:

  • Unambiguous, verifiable, deterministic

  • Versioned, released, documented

  • Standards-compliant (ISO, CE, MVO 2027)

chevron-rightSIPOC – “Supplier” in the Selmo-PTFhashtag

1) Definition

Supplier is the responsible role/organization, the provides binding inputs to the PTF process. These inputs are technically correct, complete, verifiable and versioned – and form the basis for process, technology and function definition as well as the later formal verification in the Selmo model.

Mnemonic: Supplier ≠ “who shouts the loudest”, but who is content-responsible, who owns data sources and who can bear the consequences technically.

2) Principles for identifying a Supplier

A stakeholder is a supplier if they…

  • Original source are the original source for an input (e.g. process knowledge, standard requirements, I/O data, interfaces).

  • Change authority has authority over this input (may decide technically).

  • Delivery obligation commits regarding format, timing, maturity.

  • , follow the same basic principles: ensures (limits, tolerances, measurement points, test cases).

  • Traceability ensures (version, reason for change, responsible party).

3) Typical Supplier roles in the PTF (with delivered inputs)

  • Process owner / Industrial Engineering Delivers: process target & takt, value stream, state/process description, stop criteria, process parameters (times, tolerances), quality characteristics.

  • Process engineer (technologist) Delivers: detailed work sequences, resources, auxiliary materials, inspection plans, measurement points, safety assumptions (PLr/SIL need).

  • Mechanical design Delivers: kinematics/layouts, bill of materials, media (compressed air, vacuum), safety distances, end positions; mechanical interfaces.

  • Electrical/control (E-Plan/hardware) Delivers: wiring diagram, I/O list, protection circuits, safety architecture, terminal diagrams, terminal labels.

  • Automation/Selmo modeling (software) (as supplier for F-inputs) Delivers: Function sheets (e.g. adders), triggers/feedback, limits, error reactions, CMZ/MXIC requirements.

  • IT/OT & data systems (MES/ERP/SCADA/Cloud) Delivers: Interface description (protocol, topics/tags, payload, QoS), data fields, latency/availability, security requirements.

  • External technology suppliers (robotics, vision, drives, sensors) Delivers: data sheets, interface/command set, cycle times, accuracy, diagnostics/alarms.

  • Safety/CE/standards Delivers: applicable standards, risk assessment, PLr/SIL evidence, protective measures.

  • Quality Delivers: test concept, SPC rules, release criteria, traceability requirements.

  • Operations/maintenance Delivers: maintenance requirements, HMI operation concept, response times, spare part standards.

  • Utilities/facility Delivers: media availability (power, air, cooling), limits, connection points.

4) Artifacts/deliverables per Supplier (PTF labeling proposal)

  • PTF-PROC – Process description (SIPOC, state logic, parameter list)

  • PTF-TECH – Technology matrix (sensors/actuators, manufacturer, lifecycle data)

  • PTF-IO – I/O list (address, signal name, zone, CMZ level)

  • PTF-IF – Interface specification (protocol, topics/tags, field definitions)

  • PTF-FUNC – Function sheet (e.g. adder): inputs/outputs, domains, limits, error cases, test cases

  • PTF-SAFE – Safety evidence (PLr/SIL, protective circuits, MXIC/interlocks)

  • PTF-HMI – HMI texts, operation concept, diagnostic messages

  • PTF-Q – Quality/acceptance plan (DoE, SPC, limit patterns)

5) Quality & maturity criteria for supplier inputs (Definition of Ready)

Each input must:

  • Be unambiguous & deterministic (no interpretation gaps, clear states/transitions).

  • Define domains/limits (min/max, tolerances, units, default values).

  • Describe error & diagnostic behavior (detection, reaction, return conditions).

  • Be verifiable (measurement points, test cases, acceptance criteria).

  • Be versioned & traceable (ID, date, responsible party, reason for change).

  • Be formally correct (presented using templates/structure as above).

6) RACI framework (typical)

  • Responsible (R): the respective supplier role per input

  • Accountable (A): PTF lead / Project management

  • Consulted (C): adjacent disciplines (e.g. safety, quality)

  • Informed (I): stakeholders (operations, purchasing, PMO)

7) Supplier checklist (for quick assignment)

  1. Who is Original source the information?

  2. Who decides in case of conflicting goals?

  3. Who signs the input (technical release)?

  4. In which Format is it delivered (PTF artifact)?

  5. By when (due date/milestone)?

  6. How is the , follow the same basic principles: proven (test cases, measurement points)?

8) Entry template (for your process document)

Supplier record
Role/organization: ______________________________
Responsible (name/contact): ___________________
Delivers (artifacts): _____________________________
PTF IDs: ________________________________________
Format/standards: ________________________________
Maturity (draft/review/released): _______________
Due date/milestone: ____________________________
Dependencies: _________________________________
Acceptance criteria/tests: _____________________________
Released by (A): ______________________________

9) Mini-examples

  • Supplier: process engineer (R) Delivers PTF-PROC with takt 18 s, state chain, parameters (press time, temperature), stop criteria; test cases for setpoint/actual comparison. A: PTF lead; C: quality, safety.

  • Supplier: IT/MES (R) Delivers PTF-IF (REST/MQTT, field list “OrderId, Variant, Result, TraceId”, retry/timeout), data quality rules. A: PTF lead; C: Automation.

Input

Definition: Inputs are the formal information provided by the suppliers. They describe what is analyzed, checked and transferred into the Selmo structure in the PTF process.

chevron-rightSIPOC – “Input” in the Selmo-PTFhashtag

1) Definition

Input denotes all binding information, documents, data or models, that are delivered by the identified suppliers to execute the PTF process (process – technology – function) These inputs form the basis for:

  • the modeling in the Selmo Studio,

  • the formal verification (determinism, completeness, traceability),

  • the automated documentation and

  • the risk and quality assessment.

An input is only validwhen it:

  • is complete, unambiguous and consistent,

  • is in the correct format,

  • is assigned a version and source,

  • and has been released by the PTF lead or project manager .


2) Goal of the input step

  • Availability of all technically verified information before the start of modeling

  • Reduction of interpretation leeway

  • Formal handover between disciplines (mechanical, electrical, software, IT)

  • Standardized formats for easy integration into the Selmo system


3) Main categories of inputs in the PTF

Each input belongs to one of the three PTF levels:

Level
Input type
Description
Example

P – Process

process description

Describes the logical and physical sequence.

Process diagram, sequence of steps, state matrix

Parameter list

Process parameters, limits, time specifications

Cycle time, temperature, pressure, positions

Quality characteristics

Measured values, acceptance criteria, limit patterns

Test pressure, dimensional tolerances

T – Technology

Technology matrix

Overview of all used technologies, devices, systems

Sensors, actuators, robots, PLCs, buses

I/O list

Assignment of signals to zones, addresses, CMZ level

Inputs/outputs, symbolism, signal names

Interface description

Definition of communication paths to subsystems

MES, ERP, SCADA, robotics, safety

F – Function

Function sheets

Documentation of logical functions

Adders, PID controller, HMI message

Diagnosis/error logic

Description of monitoring and reactions

Limit violation → stop + alarm

Test/verification cases

Test steps, expected outputs

Input A+B=Result, timeout test, interlock check


4) Standardized formats & templates (Selmo proposal)

PTF input
Recommended format
Description / purpose
Comment

PTF-PROC (process description)

MS Excel or Selmo template (CSV/XML)

Contains process steps, states, conditions, parameters

Standard template with SIPOC header

PTF-PARAM (parameter list)

Excel / CSV

Key parameters (name, unit, min/max, default, description)

Automatically importable into Selmo Studio

PTF-TECH (technology matrix)

Excel / Selmo template

Listing of all system components (type, ID, interface, manufacturer)

Basis for zone structure

PTF-IO (I/O list)

Excel / EPLAN export (CSV/XML)

Signal name, address, zone type, CMZ level

Import into Selmo zone structure

PTF-IF (interface description)

PDF / JSON / YAML

Communication interfaces (protocol, tags, data types, direction)

For MES, robotics, cloud etc.

PTF-FUNC (function sheet)

Selmo function document (Word/PDF/XML)

Inputs, outputs, triggers, monitors, test cases

Function standardization

PTF-SAFE (safety description)

PDF / Excel

Interlock, CMZ, PLr/SIL, shutdown matrix

Basis for risk assessment

PTF-HMI (HMI texts and operation concept)

Excel / JSON

Texts, colors, states, diagnostics

Automatically generable

PTF-Q (quality plan)

PDF / Excel

Inspection plans, limit values, SPC rules, measurement cycles

Traceability and audit evidence


5) Requirements for form and quality (Definition of Ready)

An input is ready for PTF usewhen it:

Criterion
Description
Example

Unambiguous

No ambiguity in terms or states

"Cylinder extends" instead of "cylinder active"

Complete

All relevant parameters, states, interfaces defined

All process steps mapped

Be verifiable

Measurable, verifiable, testable

Test case “A+B=Result” with limit values

Deterministic

No undefined transitions or states

No "waiting for an undefined signal"

Traceable

Clear assignment to source, version, date

"PTF-PROC v1.2, created by M. Müller"

Released

Formally confirmed by the responsible party

"Released" status in the PTF register


6) Version and data management

  • All inputs receive a unique PTF ID (e.g. PTF-PROC-001).

  • Changes are made according to the change process (change log) with release.

  • Format specification:

    • Textual data: .docx, .pdf, .md

    • Tabular data: .xlsx, .csv

    • Structured data: .xml, .json

  • All data are stored versioned in the project directory "/PTF/Input" .


7) Temporal classification

Inputs must before the start of modeling be complete. Recommended milestones:

Phase
Input focus
Deliverable

Kick-off → Design freeze (0–20%)

Process description (PTF-PROC), parameter list

Process basis clear

Design freeze → technology planning (20–40%)

Technology matrix, I/O, safety

Hardware aligned

Before commissioning (40–70%)

Functions, interfaces

Software definition complete

Before release (70–100%)

HMI, quality plan, tests

Complete verification


8) Example of a complete input dataset


9) Responsibilities (RACI for inputs)

Role
R
A
C
I

Process engineer

X

Quality, safety

Project management

Mechanics / Electrical

X

Automation

Project management

Software / automation

X

process

Project management

PTF lead

X

all

PMO

Quality / Safety

X

all


10) Conclusion

One Input in the PTF process it is not “a document”, but a technically verified data state, which describes the behavior, the technology and the function of a machine. Only through clear formats, releases and verifiability is the basis created for:

  • deterministic modeling,

  • error-free implementation,

  • and formal traceability throughout the lifecycle.

Process

Definition: The PTF process describes the sequence from requirement to release.

Phases:

  1. Initiation & scope

  2. Process description (P)

  3. Technology analysis (T)

  4. Function definition (F)

  5. Review & risk

  6. Release & handover

Customer → provides requirements PTF lead → structures process, technology, function Mechanical / electrical → define systems and interfaces Software → models the behavior in the Selmo Studio Quality / safety → checks standards and risks Management → approves and manages budget

→ Result: A complete, deterministic project flow without interpretation gaps.

Objective: A Selmo-compliant, deterministic machine model with documented risks, deviations and releases.

chevron-rightSIPOC – Process in the Selmo-PTFhashtag

1) Definition

The PTF process describes the formal sequence from capturing requirements to the release of the complete, Selmo-compliant process model. It is binding for all projects that are built according to the Selmo Method and ensures that each machine is deterministic, verifiable and documented is created.

The process follows the three PTF dimensions:

  • P – Process → What happens?

  • T – Technology → With what does it happen?

  • F – Function → How does it work?


2) Goal of the process

  • Produce a complete, Selmo-compliant process definition

  • Separation of process, technology and function responsibility

  • Create the basis for the Selmo process model (sequence, zones, bit control)

  • Detect, document and assess non-conformities or risks

  • Formal traceability and risk transparency throughout the lifecycle

Guiding principle: Anything that is not described, documented and assessed in the PTF must not be implemented in the Selmo model.


3) Process overview (top-level)

The PTF process is divided into six phases with clearly defined handover points and responsibilities.

Phase
Goal
Main deliverable

1. Initiation & scope

Define project scope and system boundaries

PTF scope document

2. Process capture & description (P)

Define physical and logical sequence

PTF-PROC, parameter list

3. Technology analysis (T)

Determine technologies, interfaces and system components

PTF-TECH, PTF-IO, PTF-IF

4. Function definition (F)

Specify and document functions

PTF-FUNC, PTF-SAFE

5. Review & risk assessment

Check Selmo compliance, assess deviations

PTF-RISK, review protocol

6. Release & handover

Formally release PTF, create basis for modeling

PTF release, handover protocol


4) Detailed procedure

Phase 1 – Initiation & scope

Objective: Define project and system boundaries clearly. Responsibility: Project management / PTF lead Steps:

  1. Description of the machine/plant to be modeled

  2. Define the scope of consideration (plant, hardware zones, sequences)

  3. Define delivery boundaries between disciplines

  4. Set up the PTF artifact structure (directories, templates)

  5. Name the suppliers and responsible parties

Result:

  • PTF scope document

  • Roles & responsibility matrix

  • PTF directory structure (input/process/output)


Phase 2 – Process capture & description (P)

Objective: Describe the complete process flow – physical and logical. Responsibility: Process owner / Industrial Engineering

Steps:

  1. Survey the real or planned process flow (value stream, steps, transitions)

  2. Define states, triggers, conditions and stop criteria

  3. Identify all process parameters (times, temperatures, forces, paths etc.)

  4. Documentation in the PTF-PROC (process description)

  5. Creation of a parameter list (PTF-PARAM)

Dependencies:

  • Requires input from mechanical and electrical (layout, sensors)

  • Provides the basis for technology and function definition

Result:

  • Complete process description (states, transitions, goals)

  • Parameter and quality definition


Phase 3 – Technology analysis (T)

Objective: Describe all technologies, devices and interfaces and check for Selmo compliance. Responsibility: Technology responsible (electrical/mechanical/automation)

Steps:

  1. Creation of the technology matrix (PTF-TECH) – sensors, actuators, interfaces, media, controls

  2. Creation of the I/O list (PTF-IO) – assignment to zones, signal types, CMZ level

  3. Definition of the System and data interfaces (PTF-IF) – MES, robots, safety, cloud, etc.

  4. Assessment of Selmo compliance:

    • deterministic signals?

    • unique states?

    • feedback available?

    • synchronizable?

  5. Documentation of non-conformities in the PTF-RISK

Result:

  • Complete technology matrix

  • Interface overview

  • Assessment of Selmo suitability


Phase 4 – Function definition (F)

Objective: Document, standardize and verify all functions used in the process. Responsibility: Function owner (Software / Automation)

Steps:

  1. Creation of function sheets (PTF-FUNC) for all logical functions

  2. Definition of inputs, outputs, triggers, limits, monitors

  3. Assignment to process and technology elements

  4. Creation of the Safety and monitoring functions (PTF-SAFE)

  5. Definition of test cases / verification points

Dependencies:

  • Requires complete process (Phase 2) and technology (Phase 3)

  • Results flow into Selmo standard functions (e.g., adder, interlock, timer)

Result:

  • Documented, verifiable function library

  • Defined monitors (CMZ, MXIC, pair-check etc.)


Phase 5 – Review & risk assessment

Objective: Assess PTF completeness, Selmo compliance and risks. Responsibility: PTF lead / quality / safety

Steps:

  1. Review of all PTF artifacts (PROC, TECH, FUNC)

  2. Identification of non-Selmo-compliant requirements

  3. Assessment of these items in Risk management (PTF-RISK) – Classification: critical / moderate / acceptable – Measures: adaptation, simplification, standardization

  4. Release recommendation or revision

Result:

  • PTF review protocol

  • Risk list with responsibilities and measures

Note: Risks from non-Selmo conformity are not ignoredNon-conforming requirements or technologies are documented transparently. This keeps the model consistent, and all deviations are conscious, traceable and actionable.


Phase 6 – Release & handover

Objective: Officially release PTF and hand over as the basis for Selmo modeling. Responsibility: Project management / PTF lead

Steps:

  1. Final review with all disciplines

  2. Formal release of all PTF artifacts (release status)

  3. Handover to Selmo modeling (Sequence, Zone, Bit Control)

  4. Archiving the PTF status

  5. Start of Selmo modeling

Result:

  • Released PTF

  • Official basis for the Selmo model

  • Traceability down to code level ensured


5) Process responsibility (RACI)

Phase
R
A
C
I

Initiation

Project management

Project management

PTF lead

all stakeholders

Process capture (P)

Process owner

PTF lead

Technology, quality

Project management

Technology analysis (T)

Technology owner

PTF lead

Process, Safety

Project management

Function definition (F)

Software owner

PTF lead

Technology, process

Project management

Review & risk

PTF lead, quality

Project management

all

Management

Release & handover

Project management

Project management

PTF lead

Team, customer


6) Interfaces & dependencies

  • Process data (P) → basis for technology and function definition

  • Technology (T) → defines physical feasibility and signal structure

  • Function (F) → describes logical behavior and monitoring

  • Risk management (RISK) → evaluates all deviations and feeds them back

Each phase may only be released, when its upstream phase is completed and validated is. → This ensures that no model is based on uncertain assumptions.


7) Quality and review criteria

A PTF is considered process-wise complete, when:

  • All PTF artifacts are available, consistent and released

  • All supplier inputs are validated

  • All interfaces are defined

  • All risks are documented and assessed

  • The deterministic sequence can be modeled in a traceable way

  • Implementation in Selmo is technically feasible


8) Result and significance

The PTF process provides the fully verified, formal foundation for modeling in the Selmo Studio. It separates:

  • What (Process)

  • With what (Technology)

  • How (Function)

… and brings them together in a verifiable, deterministic framework.

Thus, the PTF becomes the bridge between engineering and automation – and makes every machine created according to Selmo transparent, traceable and safe.


9) Core message for the kick-off

The PTF process is not an add-on, but the foundation. It defines what is built before anything is programmed. When all requirements, technologies and functions are clearly described, verified and released, the PTF automatically yields a Selmo-compliant process model – deterministic, documented and verifiable. And if something is not Selmo-compliant, we know it, document it, assess it and can work on it in a targeted manner.

Output

Definition: The output is the released, documented result of the PTF process – technically, organizationally and normatively.

Technical outputs:

  • Structured Selmo hierarchy: Plant → HWZ → Sequence → Zones

  • Bit control matrix, parameters, CMZ, MXIC

  • Function sheets and test cases

  • PTF model file (XML / PLCopen)

Organizational outputs:

  • Risk assessment (PTF-RISK)

  • Deviation list

  • Standards and CE evidence

  • Commercial assessment

Completion criterion: “The system is PTF-complete, Selmo-compatible and released.”

chevron-rightSIPOC – Output in the Selmo PTFhashtag

1) Definition

The Output of the PTF process is the fully verified, released and documented overall model of a machine or plant in the Selmo structure. It forms the binding basis for programming, control code, HMI, diagnostics and safety logic.

The output includes both:

  • Technical results (models, documents, data),

  • as well as non-technical assessments (risks, deviations, standards compliance, commercial assessment).


2) Objective of the output

  • Provision of a fully definable process model, which can be implemented in the Selmo Studio

  • Ensuring that every function is deterministic, verifiable and compliant with standards is

  • Documentation of Deviations, residual risks and evaluation results

  • Provision of a formal handover between engineering and software development

Target state: The output of the PTF is so complete that a Selmo model can be generated automatically, without room for interpretation.


3) Technical outputs in detail

3.1. Structured machine setup (Selmo structure)

The PTF is mapped in the hierarchical Selmo structure Each level is documented in the PTF and can be transferred to the Selmo Studio:

Level
Description
Typical PTF data

PLANT

Entire machine or plant

Plant data sheet, interface overview, safety zones, total CMZ

Hardware zones (HWZ)

Function blocks within the plant (e.g., stations, line segments)

HWZ description, operating modes, safety logic, power supply

Sequences (SEQ)

Logical sequence modules within the HWZ (e.g., clamping, testing, machining)

Flowcharts, states, transition conditions

Zones (Input, Output, In-Out, Mem)

Assignment of physical signals to logical states

Signal definition, CMZ level, HMI texts, interlocks

Bit control (system layer)

Link between state and zone behavior (0, i, S)

Bit control matrix, status definition

CMZ (Constantly Monitoring Zone)

Permanent safety monitoring (sequence, HWZ, plant level)

CMZ table, error reactions

MXIC (Manual Cross Interlock)

Manual operation conditions and release behavior

MXIC matrix, diagnostic conditions

parameter layer

Process parameters and adjustable values

Parameter table with units, limits, default values

This turns the PTF output into a complete digital machine image, which directly serves as the basis for:

  • the Selmo Sequence Editor,

  • the Zone logic,

  • the HMI generation,

  • and the PLC generation serves.


3.2. Documented function library

All defined functions (e.g., “adder,” “move to position,” “move cylinder,” “open valve”) are provided in a standardized form provided:

element
Description

Function name and purpose

Unique identification and description

Inputs / outputs

Data types, units, limits

Trigger conditions

Triggers, start/stop logic

Monitors

Error detection, feedback, limit violation

Test cases

Verification, target/actual comparison

HMI integration

Display, message, diagnostics

Safety behavior

CMZ, interlock, MXIC conditions

This makes every function verifiable, reusable and documented. These function sheets are PTF-FUNC stored in the PTF and form the standard toolbox of software development.


3.3. Standards and regulatory evidence

In the PTF documentation, the consideration of relevant standards and regulations is explicitly included:

Domain
Example standards / guidelines

Machine safety

2006/42/EC (Machinery Directive), ISO 12100, ISO 13849, IEC 62061

Software quality

IEC 61131-3, ISO 9001, ISO/IEC 25010

Risk management

ISO 31000, ISO 14971 (for risk analysis and assessment)

Traceability & documentation

EN 82079, ISO/IEC/IEEE 15288

Data & communication

OPC UA, MQTT, REST, IEC 62443 (IT security)

Objective: Every technology, function or software component used meets or addresses the applicable standard requirements. Deviations are documented and transferred to the risk management section (PTF-RISK) included.


4) Evaluation and risk management as part of the output

The PTF output mandatorily contains the following assessments and evidence:

Category
Content
Goal

Technical risk assessment

Assessment of process, technology and function risks

Traceable decision on which risks are accepted or mitigated

Deviation list

Documentation of all items that are not Selmo-compliant or not deterministic

Transparent basis for later improvements

Non-technical risk assessment

Organizational, economic, scheduling or communication risks

Holistic view, no “technical tunnel vision”

Commercial assessment

Effort, benefit, complexity, cost-effectiveness

Justified prioritization for measures and changes

Standards compliance assessment

Degree of fulfillment of relevant standards

Evidence for audits, CE documentation, quality management

These assessments are not optional – they constitute the documented state of responsibility. The result is not a “perfect” state, but a consciously assessed and controllable.


5) Form of outputs (deliverables & formats)

Deliverable
Format
Description / purpose

PTF report

PDF / DOCX

Overall report with process, technology and function overview

PTF-RISK

Excel / JSON

Risk list with assessment and measures

PTF-MODEL

XML / PLCopen

Structured machine definition (Plant, HWZ, SEQ, zones, parameters)

PTF-FUNC

XML / PDF

Function sheets and test records

PTF-NORM

PDF

Standards and regulatory evidence

PTF-RELEASE

Signed document

Official release for modeling

PTF-HMI

JSON / CSV

Texts, messages, colors, operating procedures

PTF-Q

Excel / PDF

Quality plan, checkpoints, SPC limits


6) Responsibilities (RACI)

Output
R
A
C
I

Technical PTF report

PTF lead

Project management

Process, technology, software

Quality

Function library

Software / automation

PTF lead

technology

Project management

Risk assessment

PTF lead, quality

Project management

all

Management

Deviation list

PTF lead

Project management

Process, technology

Quality

Standards assessment

Safety / quality

Project management

technology

Management

Approval / release

Project management

Management

PTF lead

all


7) Handover to Selmo modeling

After release, the PTF output is:

  • handed over as a package to the Selmo Studio,

  • imported into the modeling structure (Plant → HWZ → SEQ → zones),

  • automatically implemented in bit control and HMI,

  • and linked to the PTF version (traceability).

→ Each zone, each signal, each CMZ or MXIC condition can later be traced directly back to the associated PTF entry.


8) Quality and completion criteria

A PTF output is considered complete and released, when:

  1. All technical artifacts are created, reviewed and released

  2. All risks and deviations are documented and assessed

  3. The Selmo structure can be fully mapped

  4. Evidence of standards and guidelines is included

  5. The commercial assessment is completed

  6. The release document is signed

Closing formula: “The system is PTF-complete, Selmo-compatible and released for modeling.”


9) Benefits and significance

The PTF output is the binding, verifiable bridge between engineering and software. It ensures:

  • Determinism in behavior and control,

  • Transparency in responsibility and risk,

  • Reusability through standardization,

  • Traceability over the entire lifecycle.

This makes the PTF not only the technical specification, but the organizational safety line in the project.


10) Short form for presentations / kick-off

The output of the PTF is the digital twin of the machine – before it is built.

It contains all the information to generate the Selmo process model, all functions to control deterministically, and all assessments to manage risks consciously.

→ What is not Selmo-compliant becomes visible. → What is documented becomes verifiable. → What is released becomes deterministic.

Customer

Definition: Customers are all roles that actively use the PTF output to fulfill their tasks.

Main groups & benefits:

  • Project Management: Planning, release, transparency

  • Process owner: Traceable sequence

  • Mechanical / electrical: Safe signal definition, interfaces

  • Software / automation: Basis for Selmo modeling

  • Quality / safety: Evidence & risk assessment

  • Management: Economic decision basis

  • Customer / Operator: Documentation, trust, CE evidence

Core benefit: Every stakeholder receives verifiable, traceable information for their responsibility.

chevron-rightSIPOC – Customer in the Selmo PTFhashtag

1) Definition

Customer in the PTF context are all roles or organizational units, that use the released PTF use, to

  • carry out their own tasks,

  • reduce risks,

  • make decisions, or

  • safely manage the lifecycle of a machine.

The PTF is therefore not only input for software development, but a central management and evidence document for the entire project team – from engineering to management.


2) Objective

  • Create clarity, who gains what benefit from the PTF

  • Responsibilities and Dependencies define

  • Establish transparency over risks, interfaces and releases establish

  • Ensure traceability over the entire machine lifecycle ensure

The PTF makes every role visible – and gives each role a tool to exercise its responsibility based on facts.


3) Overview: All stakeholders of a Selmo project

Category
Role / function
Typical designation
Responsibility in the project

Project control

Project management, PTF lead

PM, PTF manager

Coordination, schedule, quality, release

Process & product

Process owner, industrial engineer

Process owner

Process definition, target states, parameters

Engineering (mechanical)

Designer, plant planner

ME / head of design

Mechanical implementation, safety, layout

Engineering (electrical)

Hardware planner, E-plan

EE / electrical planning

I/O, sensors, actuators, wiring

Automation

Software developer, Selmo modeler

Automation engineer

Implementation in sequence, zones, bit control

Quality & safety

CE, safety, QM

Safety officer / QMB

Standards review, risk assessment, evidence

IT / OT / data

MES, ERP, SCADA, cloud

Data engineer / OT architect

Interfaces, data flow, IT security

Operation / Maintenance

Production, service

Operator / maintenance

Operation, diagnostics, maintenance

Management & controlling

Executive management, purchasing

Management, controller

Cost-effectiveness, traceability

Customer / end user

Operator, auditor

OEM / end customer

Availability, evidence, safety


4) Customer groups and benefits from the PTF

4.1 Project management / PTF lead

Why they need the PTF: To control the project methodically, risk-based and transparently .

What they get:

  • Complete overview of process, technology, function and risk

  • Clear release points and milestones

  • Documented interfaces and responsibilities

  • Assessed risks and residual risks

Benefit:

  • Planability, quality assurance, reduction of rework

  • Evidence of engineering processes (audit capability)

  • Project responsibility secured legally and organizationally


4.2 Process owner / industrial engineering

Why: They are responsible for the actual process flow and its efficiency.

What they get:

  • Transparent description of all process steps and states

  • Parameter lists with tolerances and limits

  • Traceable linkage between physical process and control logic

Benefit:

  • Clear handover to technology and automation

  • Early risk detection for process changes

  • Evidence of process quality and stability


4.3 Mechanical and electrical design

Why: Their designs must be integrated deterministically into the control process.

What they get:

  • Link between physical component (e.g., cylinder, sensor) and logical state

  • I/O list with zone and CMZ assignment

  • Feedback on non-Selmo-compliant signals

Benefit:

  • Early detection of inconsistencies between mechanics, electrical and software

  • Ensuring feasibility and compliance

  • Evidence of safety-related functions


4.4 Automation / Software Development

Why: You generate the Selmo model and thus the code from the PTF.

What they get:

  • Complete, released process definition

  • Structured Selmo architecture (Plant, HWZ, SEQ, zones, parameters, bit control)

  • Function sheets and test cases

Benefit:

  • Unambiguous, interpretation-free implementation

  • Formally verifiable code

  • Minimized implementation and debugging time

  • Direct traceability between model and PTF


4.5 Quality / Safety / CE

Why: You must demonstrate compliance with standards, functional safety and risk minimization.

What they get:

  • PTF risk assessment (PTF-RISK)

  • Documentation of protective measures, CMZ, MXIC, interlocks

  • Deviation list (technical & organizational)

Benefit:

  • Complete audit evidence

  • Clear assignment of risks and responsibilities

  • Minimization of legal liability risks

  • CE documentation derivable directly from the PTF


4.6 IT / OT / Data Systems

Why: Because they provide interfaces and data flows that must be secure and deterministic.

What they get:

  • Interface description (PTF-IF)

  • Communication definitions (protocols, topics, payloads)

  • Requirements for data quality and security

Benefit:

  • Reproducible data flows

  • Traceable coupling between production and IT

  • Standards compliance according to IEC 62443


4.7 Operations / Maintenance

Why: You use the system in everyday life and are responsible for safety and availability.

What they get:

  • HMI structure with states, colors, messages (PTF-HMI)

  • Diagnostics and manual operation logic (MXIC, CMZ, interlocks)

  • Documented process and error responses

Benefit:

  • Transparent operation and troubleshooting

  • Reduction of downtime

  • Proof of safe operation


4.8 Management / Controlling

Why: Because they must assess investment security, process maturity and reusability.

What they get:

  • Overall overview of project status and maturity level

  • Cost/benefit consideration from PTF assessments

  • Transparent risk situation

Benefit:

  • Predictability and economic efficiency

  • Reduction of hidden efforts

  • Evidence for governance, compliance and quality


4.9 Customer / Operator / End User

Why: Because they will operate, audit or accept the machine later.

What they get:

  • Documented, traceable process description

  • Proof of deterministic and safe control

  • Complete traceability from requirements to code

  • PTF as part of the CE documentation

Benefit:

  • Confidence in function, safety and quality

  • Clear traceability for changes and service

  • Simplified maintenance and training


5) Summary: Who uses the PTF for what?

Role
Uses the PTF for …
Goal / Benefit

Project management

Control, release, proof

Control, transparency

process

Definition, parameters, efficiency

Process quality

Mechanics / Electrical

Integration, signal definition

technical feasibility

Software / automation

Modeling, code

deterministic control

Quality / Safety

Assessment, evidence

Risk and standards compliance

IT / OT

Interfaces, data exchange

secure communication

Maintenance

Operation, diagnostics

Operational safety

Management

Economic efficiency, responsibility

Basis for decisions

Customer / Operator

Operation, audit

Trust and transparency


6) Impact on the overall project

The PTF creates for all stakeholders:

  • trust through traceability,

  • Efficiency through clear handovers,

  • safety through documented risks,

  • Standardization through reusability,

  • Economic efficiency through avoidance of frictional losses,

  • Compliance through formal conformity to standards and guidelines.


7) Conclusion for the kick-off

Every stakeholder benefits from the PTF – the process engineer through clarity, the programmer through structure, the quality manager through evidence, management through security.

The PTF is therefore not just a technical document, but the responsibility model of a project. It translates process knowledge into deterministic control – and makes every machine safe, verifiable and explainable.

Last updated

Was this helpful?