Foreword
This documentation is normative
This documentation describes the Selmo system in its binding form.
“Normative” means in this context:
The described terms, structures and principles are authoritative for the understanding and application of Selmo.
Divergent interpretations, alternative meanings or implicit assumptions are not part of Selmo, unless they are described here.
What is described in this documentation applies. What is not described is not part of the Selmo system.
What “normative” means here
This documentation is normative with respect to:
the terms (Plant, Hardware Zone, Sequence, Zone, …)
the structure of the model
the meaning of states, operands and monitors
the principles of operation, safety and diagnostics
the attitude, from which Selmo is applied
It defines:
what Selmo is
how Selmo is conceived
how Selmo is correctly interpreted
What “normative” does not mean here
This documentation is not a standard in the legal sense and in particular does not replace no:
legal regulations
harmonized standards (e.g. ISO, IEC)
risk assessments
safety proofs
the professional responsibility of the user
Selmo does not provide an automatic conformity promise .
Normative clarity does not replace responsibility – it makes it comprehensible.
Relationship to implementation and projects
This documentation describes:
the model
not its concrete implementation
Project- or customer-specific adaptations:
may be made
but must remain traceable to this model
If an implementation deviates from this documentation, it is not the documentation that is wrong, but the deviation must be explicitly justified and evaluated.
Changes and further development
This documentation is:
versionable
further developable
traceably extendable
Changes to the Selmo system are made:
consciously
explicitly
documented
Implicit changes or silent shifts in meaning contradict the basic idea of Selmo.
Stability does not arise from stagnation, but from controlled further development.
Goal of this foreword
This foreword is intended to ensure that:
all readers start from the same understanding of terms assume
discussions take place on a common basis occur
misunderstandings are avoided early
Selmo is understood as what it is: a formal model for explainable machine behavior
Concluding statement
Selmo is not a matter of opinion. Selmo is a defined system.
This documentation is its reference.
Whoever applies Selmo, applies this model.
Last updated
Was this helpful?

