πŸ“Š GAP analysis with Selmo Experts

As-is/to-be analysis, GAP assessment and transformation plan for [Customer Name]


πŸ—“οΈ Project details

  • Report date: [Date]

  • Prepared by: [Consulting team]

  • Project start: [Start date]

  • Project duration: [Duration]

  • Participating teams: [List of teams]


πŸ” Overview

This procedure documents the structured execution of a GAP analysis with Selmo Experts. The aim is to capture the current situation (AS-IS), define the target states (TO-BE), assess the gaps (GAPs) and formulate a concrete transformation plan including preparation of a proof of concept (POC) or prototype.


1. 🧩 AS-IS analysis

1.1 Process description

  • Current processes: Description of the existing automation workflows including diagrams and process steps.

  • Technologies used: Overview of currently deployed systems, platforms and tools.

  • Performance indicators (KPIs): Current metrics such as cycle time, downtime, error rate, etc.

1.2 Technology assessment

  • System architecture: Representation of the existing structure of software and hardware.

  • Technical challenges: Documentation of current bottlenecks and limitations (e.g. missing integration, maintainability).

1.3 Function description

  • Functional requirements: What tasks should the system perform?

  • System functions: Which functions are currently available?

  • User requirements: What do operators, maintainers or IT expect from the automation?


2. 🎯 TO-BE definition

2.1 Process description

  • Future processes: Description of the desired workflows with a focus on determinism, transparency and HMI guidance.

  • Expected improvements: Goals such as increasing throughput, reducing errors, lowering setup times.

2.2 Technology assessment

  • Target architecture: Definition of the intended structure with platform engineering, digital twin, etc.

  • Target technologies: Which tools, control systems, models or interfaces are required?

  • Innovative solutions: Use of Selmo methodology, model-based control, bit-control, PTF model.

2.3 Function description

  • Future requirements: Which logical and technical functions are required for the TO-BE process?

  • Planned system functions: Which states, transitions and automatic modes need to be supported?

  • User expectations: How should the new system be operable, maintainable and traceable?


3. βš–οΈ GAP analysis

3.1 Identified gaps

  • Process gaps: Differences in workflows, logic or state management between AS-IS and TO-BE.

  • Technology gaps: Missing infrastructure, tools or data models.

  • Functional gaps: Missing control logic, diagnostics, interlocks, safety functions.

3.2 GAP assessment

  • Impact: Which business risks, losses or inefficiencies arise from the gaps?

  • Prioritization: Assessment by criticality and implementation potential (e.g. A – high, B – medium, C – low).


4. πŸ› οΈ Action plan

4.1 Concrete measures

  • Process optimization: Implementation of standardized, deterministic workflows (e.g. with Selmo sequences).

  • Technology upgrades: Introduction of modern control systems, Selmo Studio, central diagnostic functions.

  • Functional extensions: Integration of Bit-Control, CMZ, MXIC, Sequence Cross etc.

4.2 Responsibilities & resources

  • Role allocation: Who takes which sub-tasks (internal / Selmo / external partners)?

  • Resource requirements: Time, personnel, training, technology, budget.


5. πŸš€ Transformation plan

5.1 Schedule & milestones

  • Project timeline: Roadmap from pilot through implementation to operation.

  • Key milestones: Analysis completed, POC validated, target architecture established, commissioning performed.

5.2 Target agreement

  • SMART goals: Example: "Reduction of downtime by 25% by Q2/2025."

  • Success criteria: Which metrics or evidence show that the transformation was successful?


6. πŸ§ͺ Preparation for POC / prototype

6.1 POC goals and scope

  • Objective: What should be achieved or validated with the POC?

  • Scope: Which processes, functions or line sections are affected?

6.2 Prototype development

  • Prototype description: Description of the planned demonstrator with sequence model and functional units.

  • Development plan: Steps from design, implementation, testing to handover.


7. βœ… Conclusion & next steps

7.1 Summary

  • Findings: Which structural, technological and functional GAPs exist?

  • Recommendations: Which measures should be implemented short-term, medium-term and strategically?

7.2 Next steps

  • Start implementation: Carry out the first measures (e.g. modeling an example sequence).

  • Set up monitoring: Establish KPIs and checklists to track the transformation.

  • Establish feedback loops: Review rounds, lessons learned, continuous model maintenance.


With this standardized GAP analysis we ensure that technical implementation and automation are no longer left to chance β€” but are planned in a structured, model-based and secure way. Selmo delivers the model, the method β€” and the standard for modern machine logic.

Last updated

Was this helpful?